top of page

Water Quantity or Water Quality?

Another astonishing fact is that China is not lack of water. The perception of water scarcity is due to the uneven distribution of water resources, and phenomenon of water pollution and waste.

 

China’s per capita freshwater availability was around 2128 m3 (554761 gallons) per year, more than double the internationally recognized threshold at which a country would be considered to be water-scare. The problem is that there is no such thing as an average Chinese citizen in terms of access to water. More specifically, the geographic and temporal disparity of distribution of fresh water resources means that some parts of China relish in an over-abundance of fresh water, whereas other parts of China are haunted by the specters of drought and desertification, to say nothing of declining water quality. For example, Yellow River in northern China always suffers from cutoff seasonally while cities along Yangtze River in south are always warned by floods. Thus, what I think is that compared with alleviating water disparity between south and north, it is better to say that SNWT is to stabilize water supply between south and north.

 

Former Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao used to say:“First conserve water, then transfer water; first treat pollution, then channel water; first protect the environment, then use water.” It is immoral to overlook the water quality in SNWT.

 

According to the system dynamics analysis conducted by Yu Yang, Lei Yin and Qigong Zhang, they established an economic model with four outcome variables: agricultural and industrial GDP as two economic indicators; accumulated wastewater and the groundwater funnel area as two environmental indicators to show the weight of water quality and water quantity in the economic development. So based on their simulation results from economic and environmental indicators at different levels of water quantity and quality, they found that “firstly, SNWT can provide sufficient water for economic growth in water-receiving regions. Secondly, there is an efficient quantity of transferred water, which shows the growth limitation for both agriculture and groundwater funnel. Thirdly, upgrades in water quality could mutually reinforce the quantity effect and greatly promote economic growth, too.” (Yang) Broadly speaking, both water quantity and quality are equally significant in SNWT. From the initial incentive of SNWT, the project should not just divert water to alleviate water pressure, it is also a good change to promote water quality rather than contaminating it, and to encourage sustainable development and create an “ecologically conscious civilization” (Yang).

Reference for all the information of the whole sector​

  1. Liu, Changming, and Hongxing Zheng. "South-to-north Water Transfer Schemes for China." International Journal of Water Resources Development 18.3 (2002): 453-71. Web. 28 Mar. 2016.

  2. Magee, Darrin. "Moving the River? China’s South–North Water Transfer Project." Engineering Earth (2010): 1499-514. Web. 28 Mar. 2016.

  3. Freeman, Carla. "Quenching the Dragon's Thirst: The South-North Water Transfer Project—Old Plumbing for New China?" China Environment Forum. N.p., 7 July 2011. Web. 3 May 2016.

  4. Wang, Yue. "South-North Water Transfer Project Not Sustainable, Says Chinese Official." South-North Water Transfer Project Not Sustainable, Says Chinese Official. Chinadialogue, 20 Feb. 2012. Web. 26 Mar. 2016.

  5. "Can China’s South-North Water Transfer Project and Industry Co-exist?" The Third Pole. The Third Pole, 20 Oct. 2015. Web. 26 Mar. 2016. <http://www.thethirdpole.net/2015/10/20/can-chinas-south-north-water-transfer-project-and-industry-co-exist/>.

  6. "A Canal Too Far." The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 27 Sept. 2014. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. <http://www.economist.com/news/china/21620226-worlds-biggest-water-diversion-project-will-do-little-alleviate-water-scarcity-canal-too>. 

  7. Crow-Miller, Britt. "Diverted Opportunity: Inequality and What the South-North Water Transfer Project Really Means for China." Global Water Forum. 4 Mar. 2014. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. <http://www.globalwaterforum.org/2014/03/04/diverted-opportunity-inequality-and-what-the-south-north-water-transfer-project-really-means-for-china/> 

  8. Larson, Christina. "On Chinese Water Project, A Struggle Over Sound Science." Yale Environment 360. 8 Jan. 2009. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. <http://e360.yale.edu/feature/on_chinese_water_project_a_struggle_over_sound_science/2103/>.

  9. Kirchner, Ruth. "China's Massive Water Diversion Project Remains Controversial." DW. N.p., 23 Mar. 2012. Web. 28 Mar. 2016. <http://www.dw.com/en/chinas-massive-water-diversion-project-remains-controversial/a-15829304>.

  10. Berrittella, Maria, Katrin Rehdanz, and Richard S. J. Tol. "The Economic Impact of the South-North Water Transfer Project in China: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis." SSRN Electronic Journal SSRN Journal (2016). Web.

  11. Yang, Yu, Lei Yin, and Qingzong Zhang. "Quantity versus Quality in China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project: A System Dynamics Analysis."Water (2015): 1-19. Web.

  12.  James, Katerine R. "Policy and Planning for Large Water Infrastructure Projects in the People’s Republic of China." (2013): 45-63. Wesleyan University. Web. 3 May 2016.

  13. Moore, Scott. "Issue Brief: Water Resource Issues, Policy and Politics in China." The Brookings Institution. 12 Feb. 2013. Web. 03 May 2016. <http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2013/02/water-politics-china-moore#_edn20>.

bottom of page